Effect of physician specialty on pre-hospital intubation success

July 24, 2011 by  
Filed under All Updates, EMS, Resus, Trauma

Researchers from the London Helicopter Emergency Medical Service describe the success of pre-hospital laryngoscopy according to the grade and specialty of the HEMS physician…

There is conflicting evidence concerning the role and safety of prehospital intubation, and which providers should deliver it. Success rates for physician-performed rapid sequence induction are reported to be 97-100%, with limited evidence of improved survival in some patient groups. However, there is also evidence that prehospital intubation and ventilation can do harm. Prospective data were recorded on the success of intubation, the quality of the laryngeal view obtained and the number of attempts at intubation. These data were then analysed by the grade of intubating doctor and whether the intubating doctor had a background in anaesthesia or emergency medicine. All groups had a similar success rate after two attempts at intubation. Doctors with a background in anaesthesia and consultant emergency physicians had a significantly better first-pass intubation rate than emergency medicine trainees. The quality of laryngeal view was significantly better in doctors with an anaesthetics background.

Success in physician prehospital rapid sequence intubation: what is the effect of base speciality and length of anaesthetic training?
Emerg Med J. 2011 Mar;28(3):225-9

Comments

2 Responses to “Effect of physician specialty on pre-hospital intubation success”

  1. Andrew Walker on July 24th, 2011 20:24

    Good to see that success improves with ED fellowship! Must be all the time spent writing!

  2. Jason on July 30th, 2011 15:59

    The Air Ambulance Program I fly with in Southern California has equal success rates, and we have Nurse/Paramedic crew configuration. We also train extensively on all aspects of intubating with a heavy emphasis on preoxygenation, the mechanics of opening the airway, visualization of the glottic opening with the Miller and Mac technique, and the use of the Bougie stylet. I think the key to success that this study points toward is the quality and volume of training Doctors receive as compared to other Prehospital Providers. As it has been stated here before, the amount of training that many US Ground Programs are giving their Paramedics is poor and very lacking.